Re: Motion to remove the operations manual from the Wiki

Yes, and before some else gets me, I must say that I did not properly make my amendment. A real motion to amend a motion would have been
I move to amend the motion by stiking out the words "removed from" and adding in its place "maintained on" and by adding the word "also" between and and be of the original motion so that the motion would not read "That the Operations Manual be maintained on the Iris Wiki and also be posted on the AIS website." 

But, best to keep things as simple as possible.
Also, I believe the amendment has to be voted on by the board and once that is approved, the motion then has to be voted on, but not positive about that. 

I think it is important to abide by at least the intent of Robert's Rules of Order even if we do not follow every word of it.

Ron


On 3/13/2013 11:26, gary white wrote:

Please check Roberts Rules, pages 114-115 in Roberts Rules, newly revised 11th
edition.    Its true that BEFORE the motion has been announced, the original
motion holders can alter or amend the motion, but AFTER the motion has been
announced, the motion then belongs to the assembly and does not need the
approval of the original motion holders to be amended, but any member can
propose changes in a motion to amend.

Thanks,
Gary

--- On Wed, 3/13/13, Michelle Snyder <AISSecretary@irises.org> wrote:


From: Michelle Snyder <AISSecretary@irises.org>
Subject: Re: [AISdiscuss] Motion to remove the operations manual from the
Wiki
To: aisdiscuss@aisboard.org
Date: Wednesday, March 13, 2013, 11:17 AM




The people who originally moved and seconded the motion need to agree to amend
their motion.  That is Susan Boyce and John Ludi.  If they agree I will send
the amended motion out.

Michelle

On 3/13/2013 8:17 AM, Ron Killingsworth wrote:

I think the discussion the last day or so has been very productive.  I do not
agree that the operations manual is of "critical importance" - this
organizations has operated for many years without it.  I do think it would be
nice to have a document that tells you what is expected of your job, having
been appointed to advertising editor and having nothing to help me determine
what the job really was/is or how to accomplish the job.  I have written a
proposed job description for advertising editor to go in the operations
manual.

The general consensus of opinions expressed seems to be that the document
should be on the AIS web site and made easy to find, but that keeping it on
the Wiki Iris is also a good idea.  This poses the problem of updating both
versions but that should not be a problem.

I therefore:

Move to amend the motion to read:

"That the Operations Manual be maintained on the Iris Wiki and that a copy of
the Operations Manual be placed on the AIS web site and that the web site be
indexed to allow easy access to the document."

Would someone second this amendment?

Ron Killingsworth
Director, AIS
Adv Editor


On 3/11/2013 23:43, Michelle Snyder wrote:

Susan Boyce moved and John Ludi seconded the below motion.  As such, it is
officially out for discussion.

"That the Operations Manual be removed from the Iris Wiki and be
posted on the AIS Website."

Michelle Snyder
AIS Secretary


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To
sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary The archives for
AISDiscuss are at: http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
<aissecretary@irises.org>
The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
<aissecretary@irises.org>
The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index