Re: Emeritus Judges
- To: aisdiscuss@aisboard.org
- Subject: Re: Emeritus Judges
- From: RUTHBB@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:02:58 -0400 (EDT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1340197378; bh=phEb4yXPIhWwK5MrPlH2aGAHBQAI4PSkVDJLZPr+Zfs=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=x627itLwjMRgjpVgK+/4xOVOte1c0KldZEzonV7EblPR3OIUJZIr21k5x/qArBtL9 SuYM2ABPiRdxHadkOyMX92cQKUR80vMGiMg3yThukPkGgcgeesrmhVCyW5ZOMH6LAo LMF4d/1nuBLgOmlEn3B16un6hSCqvJHBxjplRU7o=
Nicely stated, Paul.
Ruth
In a message dated 6/19/2012 11:36:18 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
pwgossett@juno.com writes:
The reason you do not see a great number of Emeritus Judges is because a
judge must earn this status. He or she should not be given the status just
because they are a good person in the region. They should be given this
status because they have gone far and above what is expected of them as a
judge.
Paul
---------- Original Message ----------
From: Robert Pries <robertpries@embarqmail.com>
To: aisdiscuss@aisboard.org
Subject: Re: [AISdiscuss] Emeritus Judges
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 13:55:56 -0400 (EDT)
That is not what i said. What I am saying is holding an office at the
national level is not a requirement for Emeritus Judge. One can perform service
in many different ways. But an emeritus judge is expected to have done
something more than just the regular duties that a good judge performs. Said
judge should have had positive effects on the society over and above just
being a judge.
----- Original Message -----
Robert you have just confused me!
So you are saying that a "judge" who also holds an office should be
considered for Emeritus????? What does holding an office have to do
with judging?
I do agree if a one judges an affiliate show that is on the national
level because the show is AIS approved.
Janet
---- Original Message ----
From: robertpries@embarqmail.com
To: aisdiscuss@aisboard.org
Subject: Re: [AISdiscuss] Emeritus Judges
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 08:54:44 -0400 (EDT)
>the exact wording in the Judges Handbook is "Appointment as Emeritus
>Judge is based on service at the national level that goes far beyond
>the expected conscientious performance as an AIS Judge" This does not
>state that the candidate must serve in a national office. My
>interpretation would include someone whos work would have a large
>impact including important regional responsibilities that make the
>entire system work. I believe a narrow interpretation would be too
>limiting and ignore the fact that we are all part of a national
>organization. Judges who travel outside their region to give judges
>trainings and or judge shows are then acting at a national level.
>Whenever more then one region is involved you are acting at a
>national level. If they hold office in Sections or cooperating
>societies they are acting at a national level. We have many examples
>of emeritus judges who have done no more that these things.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>Why I have NOT Read IT, I was told by a Judges Trainer that the
>"Handbook"
>states that This award is for Service done on the NATIONAL LEVEL ONLY
>?? What
>is the truth here?? I have some Regional People that are deserving.
>George
>Boyce R3VP
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Judy Keisling <keisling@swbell.net>
>To: aisdiscuss <aisdiscuss@aisboard.org>
>Sent: Mon, May 21, 2012 12:45 pm
>Subject: Re: [AISdiscuss] Emeritus Judges
>
>
>There is no limit as to how many can be nominated by one person or
>from one
>egion.
>
>
>_______________________________
>rom: Fran & Henry Day <chatmaison@comcast.net>
>o: aisdiscuss@aisboard.org
>ent: Mon, May 21, 2012 11:13:31 AM
>ubject: Re: [AISdiscuss] Emeritus Judges
>Could I nominate two judges from Region 23?
>
>Fran Day
>RVP, Region 23
>
>----- Original Message -----
>
>rom: "Robert Pries" <robertpries@embarqmail.com>
>o: aisdiscuss@aisboard.org
>ent: Monday, May 14, 2012 1:44:31 PM
>ubject: Re: [AISdiscuss] Emeritus Judges
>Each year I am reminded that our society has been growing older. Many
>of the
>udges in AIS have been judges for more than ten years. Many have also
>worked
>ery hard for the organization in many capacities, at the regional
>level and
>r the sectional level and a few on the AIS board. Whatever, I am
>certain
>here are many, whose service has gone beyond the expected
>conscientious
>erformance as judge. I also believe there are several judges whose
>service at
>he national level has gone without additional recognition. Look
>around you
>nd reflect on the judges you know. Many of us forget that it is we
>who
>ominate these special judges for Emeritus Judges. I am certain there
>are
>udges who are deserving of this status, but no one has bothered to
>send a
>ecommendation for the board to consider. I expect to nominate at
>least one.
>ut I expect there are several others who should be so recognized.
>There have
>een a number of gaps in recent years where few or no recommendations
>have
>one!
> B to the board. Considering the demographics of our society and how
>involved
>any individuals have been through the years, one would expect a much
>larger
>ohort of our judges to be Emeritus. Note Emeritus does not means they
>stop
>udging, and there is no limit to how many deserving judges can be
>made
>meritus. Personlly I think AIS has some catch up to do.
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>o sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
>aissecretary@irises.org>
>he archives for AISDiscuss are at:
>ttp://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>o sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
>aissecretary@irises.org>
>he archives for AISDiscuss are at:
>ttp://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>o sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
>aissecretary@irises.org>
>he archives for AISDiscuss are at:
>ttp://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
><aissecretary@irises.org>
>The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
>http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
><aissecretary@irises.org>
>The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
>http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
<aissecretary@irises.org>
The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
<aissecretary@irises.org>
The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
<aissecretary@irises.org>
The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
<aissecretary@irises.org>
The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index