RE: second motion to amend awards ballot

[cheryl deaton <c95039e11@rewrite.aisboard.org>]

Gerry,
If an iris has won its class's Special Medal then it should be on the ballot
for all the years it is entitled to be on the ballot for the Dyke's Medal.
But if for some reason a class does not have 3 irises eligible from the
Special Medal group, then I do not think it is fair to bring up an iris that
had previously been on the ballot for the allotted time, and was dropped for
that reason, just so there are 3 irises in each class up for the Dyke's Medal.
I think we should have (at least)  3 irises in each class IF ELIGIBLE.  Is
that clearer?
Cheryl
> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 15:47:59 -0700
> To: aisdiscuss@aisboard.org
> Subject: Re: [AISdiscuss] second motion to amend awards ballot
> From: 7e2de1ee1@rewrite.aisboard.org
>
> Cheryl,
>
> Are you saying that you think that it is more fair for an iris that
> never won its class's Special Medal should be put on the Dykes Medal
> ballot, possibly getting extra years there?
>
> Or are you saying that you want to get rid of the requirement to have
> (at least) three iris from each class on the ballot entirely?
>
>
> Gerry Snyder
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> On 7/28/2014 3:31 PM, cheryl deaton wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > I do not think it is fair to place an iris that has been dropped from the
> > eligibility list for the Dyke's Medal back on the ballot, just to bring
the
> > numbers up to 3 per class.  It really seems unfair to the other classes
of
> > irises that do not get that "extra" year of eligibility.  If there is an
error
> > in the placement of an iris on the ballot, then I believe it should be
> > addressed as additional time, but just to make up the numbers doesn't
seem
> > fair.
> > Cheryl Deaton
> >
> >> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:57:43 -0700
> >> To: aisdiscuss@aisboard.org
> >> Subject: [AISdiscuss] second motion to amend awards ballot
> >> From: 102x@rewrite.aisboard.org
> >>
> >> Bob Pries moved and Cheryl Deaton seconded the below motion.  It is now
> >> out for discussion.
> >>
> >> "In cases where there would otherwise be fewer than three irises on the
> >> ballot for the Dykes Medal in any iris class, the most recent earlier
> >> winner(s) of the Special Medal in that class that have been dropped from
> >> the Dykes Medal ballot shall be added back to the ballot in order to
> >> bring the number of candidates up to three."
> >>
> >> Michelle
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
> >> <aissecretary@irises.org>
> >> The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
> >> http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
> > <aissecretary@irises.org>
> > The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
> > http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
> <aissecretary@irises.org>
> The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
> http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
<aissecretary@irises.org>
The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/