RE: second motion to amend awards ballot

[cheryl deaton <c95039e11@rewrite.aisboard.org>]

Hello all,
I do not think it is fair to place an iris that has been dropped from the
eligibility list for the Dyke's Medal back on the ballot, just to bring the
numbers up to 3 per class.  It really seems unfair to the other classes of
irises that do not get that "extra" year of eligibility.  If there is an error
in the placement of an iris on the ballot, then I believe it should be
addressed as additional time, but just to make up the numbers doesn't seem
fair.
Cheryl Deaton

> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:57:43 -0700
> To: aisdiscuss@aisboard.org
> Subject: [AISdiscuss] second motion to amend awards ballot
> From: 102x@rewrite.aisboard.org
>
> Bob Pries moved and Cheryl Deaton seconded the below motion.  It is now
> out for discussion.
>
> "In cases where there would otherwise be fewer than three irises on the
> ballot for the Dykes Medal in any iris class, the most recent earlier
> winner(s) of the Special Medal in that class that have been dropped from
> the Dykes Medal ballot shall be added back to the ballot in order to
> bring the number of candidates up to three."
>
> Michelle
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
> <aissecretary@irises.org>
> The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
> http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
<aissecretary@irises.org>
The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/