Hello all,
I do not think it is fair to place an iris that has been dropped from the
eligibility list for the Dyke's Medal back on the ballot, just to bring the
numbers up to 3 per class. It really seems unfair to the other classes of
irises that do not get that "extra" year of eligibility. If there is an error
in the placement of an iris on the ballot, then I believe it should be
addressed as additional time, but just to make up the numbers doesn't seem
fair.
Cheryl Deaton
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:57:43 -0700
To: aisdiscuss@aisboard.org
Subject: [AISdiscuss] second motion to amend awards ballot
From: 102x@rewrite.aisboard.org
Bob Pries moved and Cheryl Deaton seconded the below motion. It is now
out for discussion.
"In cases where there would otherwise be fewer than three irises on the
ballot for the Dykes Medal in any iris class, the most recent earlier
winner(s) of the Special Medal in that class that have been dropped from
the Dykes Medal ballot shall be added back to the ballot in order to
bring the number of candidates up to three."
Michelle
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
<aissecretary@irises.org>
The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
<aissecretary@irises.org>
The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/