Re: Protocol


In a message dated 11/19/2005 3:07:44 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
rpries@sbcglobal.net writes:

Common  courtesy; E-mail is very easy to use. Because
of that I consider it very  simple to reply to any
e-mail sent directly to an officer or director.  I
understand that not everyone checks their e-mail every
day. But after  a week, unless someone is out of town I
expect at least an acknowledgement  of a receipt of
message. Is this unreasonable? I am trying to
understand  protocol among the directors and officers


I do not understand this message. What did I do to deserve it? Have I been  
lax in courtesy? Clarence Mahan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
aissecjill@earthlink.net.



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index