Re: Protocol
In a message dated 11/19/2005 3:07:44 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
rpries@sbcglobal.net writes:
Common courtesy; E-mail is very easy to use. Because
of that I consider it very simple to reply to any
e-mail sent directly to an officer or director. I
understand that not everyone checks their e-mail every
day. But after a week, unless someone is out of town I
expect at least an acknowledgement of a receipt of
message. Is this unreasonable? I am trying to
understand protocol among the directors and officers
I do not understand this message. What did I do to deserve it? Have I been
lax in courtesy? Clarence Mahan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
aissecjill@earthlink.net.
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index