Protocol
- To: AISdiscuss <aisdiscuss@aisboard.org>
- Subject: [AISdiscuss] Protocol
- From: Robt R Pries <rpries@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 12:07:19 -0800 (PST)
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
- Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=kWx5a6nnABk0xNDrnEHY7/oa56ARRSBgzE2QTwvTNq4WiyBEMAIlWK+FPVpPSB3MRTbAHz75inE6o8sYeTWD/Pg/aWJSDyq437055fM0u2pLUHJyBB/qdjWyP2GorMszgnltsN/VuSAZ0oHD3b/OF78jD/AXzk9bSy9tTRq8Rx0= ;
- Reply-to: aisdiscuss@aisboard.org
- Sender: owner-aisdiscuss@aisboard.org
Common courtesy; E-mail is very easy to use. Because
of that I consider it very simple to reply to any
e-mail sent directly to an officer or director. I
understand that not everyone checks their e-mail every
day. But after a week, unless someone is out of town I
expect at least an acknowledgement of a receipt of
message. Is this unreasonable? I am trying to
understand protocol among the directors and officers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
aissecjill@earthlink.net.
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index