Re: Motion for Strategic Planning Committee
All,
I agree with someone who previously stated that they believe this should be
a Standing committee rather than an Ad Hoc committee. I also agree with Jody
that a clear purpose needs to be defined for the committee (perhaps that
will be part of the committee's charter).
My experience with strategic planning is in corporate America (McDonnell
Douglas) where it was a VP position reporting directly to the chairman of the
board. However, every function, be it engineering, finance, manufacturing
operations, product development, etc., set long term goals as well as short term
goals, inputted meaningful info upward and was expected to brain storm and
question any departmental, divisional or corporate marching orders. The whole
process was amazingly open to debate and many great ideas came from the rank
and file. This process was successful in taking the corporation from a small
regional subcontractor on prop airplanes through to jets, missiles,
spacecraft, large boosters and much more.
The point is that irregardless of delegation to a committee, strategic
planning is part of everyone's responsibility and input should be solicited from
all. In an era of cell phones, laptops and internet centric fixation the
American Daffodil Society has actually reversed its two decade old membership
decline. This is largely attributed to their rather recent development and
implementation of their DaffSeek database of 29,000 cultivars with pictures.
This was and is a major effort to visually depict all species and named
cultivars and make it available free to any and all. It has generated more interest
in daffodils than any membership campaign, daffodil show or any of their
publications. Granted ADS is small (1,490) compared to AIS but a 71% increase in
membership in five years is remarkable in a time when all organizations are
in membership decline.
Food for thought.
Jim Morris
In a message dated 3/20/2009 8:39:16 A.M. Central Standard Time,
jody.nolin@gmail.com writes:
I would like to know the charter for this committee.
Is it strategic in the sense of the direction of AIS vis a vis
organizational issues such as cooperating societies, internal
structure, and operations? Or more long-range goals for the
organization such as fund raising and membership?
Having been the director of planning for several large agencies, I am
very much in favor of any group thinking strategically and laying out
a framework for the future. However, I would strongly recommend
defining a clear purpose for this group. My guess is, given the names
mentioned, that this has already been done. I have great respect for
the abilities of all of them. Perhaps I missed it.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Michelle Snyder
<AISSecretary@irises.org> wrote:
> On March 16, Jeanne Clay Plank moved and John Jones seconded the following
> motion. As such, the motion is now open for discussion.
>
> "That the AIS President appoint an ad hoc committee to formulate a
strategic
> plan for The American Iris Society. This committee would be: Gary White,
> Chair; Jeanne Clay Plank (Policy and historical perspective); Jill Bonino
> {Finances); Bob Pries (Publicity and Marketing); Debra Straus (RVP 17)."
>
>
> Michelle Snyder
> AIS Secretary
>
**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy
steps!
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1219619459x1201345309/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID
%3D62%26bcd%3DMarchfooterNO62)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
<aissecretary@irises.org>
The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index