Website and Statistics


Perhaps I can allay some concerns about the project.

President Morris posted:

"Designer A:  "$1200 for only a new menu  is actually insane.  If 
they're redoing the entire web site, then  that price is appropriate.  Not menu 
only, though."

 Designer B:  "Adding a few links should  only take a few minutes of 
someone's time. A change to links does not  typically require art assets to be 
redone."

Let's apply a little bit of a reality test to the comments above:

Is there anyone on the board that really believes that it were as easy as "only a few minutes" as these "professional designers" have said,  that I would not have changed the navigation already? In fact, given the suggestions that have come up over the years, I would have done it several times (or rather, presented a new version to the Board for approval)

The individuals that have made these comments have not taken the time to investigate what platform and utilities our website is built on or to understand the fact that the underlying background graphic needs to be changed to allow additional menu items to be added so they don't overlay parts of the graphic. Additionally the script that generates the menu cascades has to be modified. The modifications have to be made to the home page and the five templates we use for all the other pages on the website. 

The restriction on the navigation architecture we designed in the beginning was explained to the board before we implemented the project. 


President Morris has asked that AWSTATS be installed on our website. Unfortunately that is not possible. Our website runs on what is known as a shared server and Lunar Pages will not allow AWSTATS. If we wanted that particular program we would have to switch to a dedicated server for a cost of roughly $30.00 per month above the $20.00 per month we currently pay.

There are other free programs that can be integrated into our website. They require that some code be  inserted on our pages but that is not a overwhelming effort and I will integrate that code and generate reports on a scheduled basis. 

I don't make changes to the website changes without consulting the board. Every change that has been made was made with the approval of the board. I also don't waste money on frivolous projects. I finish projects that I start. I have a track record that proves all that.

I will commit to the following:

If the motion to fund the navigation panel and the affected graphic areas upgrade is passed:

I will immediately start the process of installing the code that will provide statistics and we can start to collect the numbers. It will take a while to collect meaningful data. Chris Hollinshead has some health issues at the moment and is not available to assist in this effort.

I will start the project to redesign the background graphic and the code for the navigation menus of home and template pages so we know how many additional menu items we will have room for. We can't make reasonable judgements on a new navigation architecture until we know how much space we have. Otherwise it would be like trying to build a car engine without knowing how big the engine compartment was. The home page is the only difficult page. The other pages follow on a limited number of templates.

When we have sufficient statistical data to make thoughtful judgement on what the top level and submenu items should be, we can submit and get board approval on the new navigation architecture, just as I did before implementing the current architecture. 

The final version of the home page and navigation panel will be presented to the board for approval before it is implemented.

Because we will have new and ongoing statistical information, and because we will have the great deal more flexibility than we have today with the top level menu items, we will have the ability to modify all levels of the menu structure iteratively as frequently as the situation warrants and the board desires. 


I have provided the statistics we currently have available before, but certainly not on a regular basis. The chart below shows the most recent daily averages and monthly totals


Thanks

John
__________________ 
John and Joanne Jones
Registrar-Recorders, American Iris Society
aisregistrar@irises.org

John Jones, Chairman, Electronic Services Committee
aiselectronicsvcs@irises.org

35572 Linda Drive
Fremont, CA 94536




The definitions of the category are:

Hit - (Also called a Request) This is each time someone asks to see any part of your site. To see your site, they will have to "hit" or "request" a specific page or file. This includes both requests that were successful and those that were not.

File - Any part of your site (an image, html page, pdf document, script, etc)

KByte - A Kilobyte or KB. This is is equal to 1024 bytes. KBytes are used when referencing the amount of data that was transferred to visitors of your site.

Page - The main file being requested to bring up a page of your site. The individual items that make up the page (graphics, media, includes, etc) do not count towards this count. By default, only pages with .htm, .html or .cgi extensions are counted.

Site - A unique IP address or hostname that requested a page / file on your site. This should be thought of as a rough count of the visitors to your site.

Visit - The first time someone views a page on your site, a visit is started. Any other pages viewed by that visitor will not be counted as a separate visit until the visit times out (usually after 30 minutes). The visit ends at this timeout point.



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index