RE: Wiki Motion


Title: Message
This topic on the iris wiki is so important.  I feel that without a doubt that the iris wiki should go forward as one of the many faces of AIS.  The more ways that the general public can find us, the better.  With all of the planned links to the AIS Website, irisregister, and pushing e-membership of AIS that will be on the iris wiki, there will be many opportunities for the public to not only learn accurate information on the irises, but will be enticed to join AIS.  So, although this site will be free to the public, it will be an excellent source of generating money for AIS, through e-memberships and new members to irisregister.  I think that a large percentage of the general population gets their information by using the web and that it is critical that we tap into this market.
 
Yes, I understand that John is concerned that the revenue produced by irisregister will decline if people can get the information on iris wiki, but as most everyone knows who has done any research on the web, that to make sure you have accurate information for your research, you must always go to the "higher" authority.  In this case, the "higher" authority is either the R&Is or irisregister.   Thus, I believe having the iris wiki will bring more people to purchasing the R&Is and using the irisregister, especially with the links that Bob Pries is putting in the iris wiki. 
 
I believe this will be a win-win situation in that it will make a name for AIS as the place to go to get accuate information on irises as opposed to going to Dave's Garden website, that it will bring in more revenue by pushing e-memberships and irisregister memberships, that it will bring more people to the AIS website, that it will help us reach out to more of the general population.  As more and more people use the web for infomration and entertainment, this is the place we need to expand into, without a doubt.
 
Lynn Williams
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-aisdiscuss@aisboard.org [mailto:owner-aisdiscuss@aisboard.org] On Behalf Of morrisje1@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 11:16 PM
To: aisdiscuss@aisboard.org
Subject: Re: [AISdiscuss] Wiki Motion

Dennis,
 
Thank you for sharing this information with us.  I must say that the Royal Horticultural Society Invitation To Join (within the ICRA's Directory) with the blonde and sexy tulips, or is it the sexy blonde and tulips?, is more enticing than our invitation to join.  We are indeed at a crossroads in how AIS is to be perceived and viewed for the future, so I hope that all the people on AIS Discuss who have been silent are at least reading this Wiki discourse regarding how we make changes for the future.
 
Jim M.
**********************************************************************************************
In a message dated 1/21/2010 10:04:50 P.M. Central Standard Time, hager@aredee.com writes:
 
It would be a good idea for anyone who wants to be a part of or to understand this discussion as it relates to the ICRA to visit their website at:
 
 
There are several links at the bottom of the page that help to explain what it is all about. I find their "copyright notice" refreshing and "How to name a cultivar" enlightening. If you dig a little further, you may get to the Directory of ICRA's at: http://www.ishs.org/sci/icralist/icralist.htm
From there, you can get to many plant society websites where you can freely access checklists.
 
I am not one to suggest that all organizations should make the same decisions, but I do find it a bit peculiar that other plant societies appear to be much healthier for having shared information more freely.
 
Thank you for reading this far.
 
Dennis Hager
 


Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index