Re: Bulletin Proposals

["K. Loberg" <loberg@adelphia.net>]

> > all good points but especially this one..."Regarding discretion, I suggest 
> > you eliminate the Bulletin Advisory >>Committee. The Editor should find 
> > his/her own advisors, and should bring his/her business to the greater 
> > >>Board for insight and discussion, like  any other Officer of the 
> > Society. "  Will



I have to say that I disagree with Anner and Will on this one.   For an 
undertaking and task as essential to AIS as the bulletin is, having a 
committee to work for the good of the bulletin is a must in my mind.    And 
I hope we lean more towards a democratic methodology as opposed to a 
dictatorial methodology in the planning and production of the bulletin from 
start to finish.   It looks to me like there are a number of individuals 
already involved in different aspects of the bulletin, are they not a part 
of the Bulletin Advisory Committee? (I don't know.)



> > "The main thought is to develop job descriptions for the Editor and 
> > Managing Editor positions.  (Jeanne)"



Jeanne, I have more questions. In our history of 79 years to date, are there 
no notes, task lists, or descriptions whatsoever for the bulletin editor 
position?   I thought there was something previously when a recruitment was 
done about 5 years ago.   And was there a change made since the October 
bulletin to create two positions, a regular editor and a managing editor?



I did a Google and Yahoo search for bulletin editor job descriptions and 
similar titles. lots of examples or content out there that could be 
considered.

Kitty Loberg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
Pat Randall <patannran@msn.com>
The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/