Re: Protocol
Hi Clarence and all: I think that I inspired Bob's note, but I hope things have been cleared up since then. Bruce (YOU, guilty of discourtesy? Certainly an impossible concept!)
-------------- Original message --------------
> In a message dated 11/19/2005 3:07:44 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> rpries@sbcglobal.net writes:
>
> Common courtesy; E-mail is very easy to use. Because
> of that I consider it very simple to reply to any
> e-mail sent directly to an officer or director. I
> understand that not everyone checks their e-mail every
> day. But after a week, unless someone is out of town I
> expect at least an acknowledgement of a receipt of
> message. Is this unreasonable? I am trying to
> understand protocol among the directors and officers
>
>
> I do not understand this message. What did I do to deserve it? Have I been
> lax in courtesy? Clarence Mahan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
> aissecjill@earthlink.net.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
aissecjill@earthlink.net.
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index