Re: Protocol


Hi Clarence and all:  I think that I inspired Bob's note, but I hope things have been cleared up since then.  Bruce   (YOU, guilty of discourtesy?  Certainly an impossible concept!)

-------------- Original message -------------- 

> In a message dated 11/19/2005 3:07:44 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, 
> rpries@sbcglobal.net writes: 
> 
> Common courtesy; E-mail is very easy to use. Because 
> of that I consider it very simple to reply to any 
> e-mail sent directly to an officer or director. I 
> understand that not everyone checks their e-mail every 
> day. But after a week, unless someone is out of town I 
> expect at least an acknowledgement of a receipt of 
> message. Is this unreasonable? I am trying to 
> understand protocol among the directors and officers 
> 
> 
> I do not understand this message. What did I do to deserve it? Have I been 
> lax in courtesy? Clarence Mahan 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary 
> aissecjill@earthlink.net. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
aissecjill@earthlink.net.



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index