Re: Protocol
- To: aisdiscuss@aisboard.org
- Subject: Re: [AISdiscuss] Protocol
- From: Robt R Pries <rpries@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:33:58 -0800 (PST)
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
- Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=3j0+YAR1pTcWRqGxvvyqNybnv/RavSxp4xNntNmY/m/Pl63mG8nnWG3hVDsO2fE+K+kQPWUPR7uOetMRPSDWaanx73ADu+H4G5XYRt3zuCcGVVedRtsdeE6K2aMe9TKvIByscM177zy9rALFesSz1Y3XtawL5D2ZmtJslCgtQmY= ;
- In-reply-to: <255.19dacb4.30b0f0aa@aol.com>
- Reply-to: aisdiscuss@aisboard.org
- Sender: owner-aisdiscuss@aisboard.org
Betty is correct in that i did not direct this message
to any one person, but threw it out for consideration.
On a discussion group such as this I never expect
everyone to reply. But I just wanted to note that if
an e-mail is sent directly to a person and not to a
group I usually expect an acknowledgement. I am
wondering if that is the way in which most directors
and officers feel.
--- Florabetty@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 11/19/2005 1:41:09 PM Mountain
> Standard Time,
> CEMahan@aol.com writes:
> rpries@sbcglobal.net writes:
>
> Common courtesy; E-mail is very easy to use.
> Because
> of that I consider it very simple to reply to any
> e-mail sent directly to an officer or director. I
> understand that not everyone checks their e-mail
> every
> day. But after a week, unless someone is out of
> town I
> expect at least an acknowledgement of a receipt of
> message. Is this unreasonable? I am trying to
> understand protocol among the directors and
> officers
>
>
> I do not understand this message. What did I do to
> deserve it? Have I been
> lax in courtesy? Clarence Mahan
> Clarence, at the fall Board meeting, Bob Pries was
> voted in as a Board member
> to replace Bill Mull, so he is probably trying to
> find out what the protocol
> is. I don't think he directed anything to you or
> anyone else. At least I'm not
> aware of anything or any other messages.
>
> Bob, we use [AISdiscuss] to bring forth any motions
> or other points of
> discussion between board meetings. Generally, it's
> good to have everyone respond,
> but this is not always the case. Sometimes the
> outcome of a motion is clear
> before everyone responds, and the discussion ceases.
>
> In addition, when discussing AIS business and
> emailing takes place between
> more than two people, copies are sent to our
> President Jeanne Plank in order to
> keep her informed.
>
> Bob, you were a great addition to our meeting, and I
> know you will serve well
> and conscientiously. Welcome to the Board!
>
> Betty Roberts, Policy Chair
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS
> Secretary
> aissecjill@earthlink.net.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
aissecjill@earthlink.net.
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index