No, that is not true, Cheryl. By Robert's Rules, once the motion has been
announced, which it has, then the motion belongs to the assembly, not the
original motion makers. The motion is no longer in control by the original
motion makers after the motion has been announced. And as such, the amended
motion must be dealt with by the assembly.
Gary
--- On Wed, 3/13/13, cheryl deaton <region15kids@hotmail.com> wrote:
From: cheryl deaton <region15kids@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: [AISdiscuss] Motion to remove the operations manual from the
Wiki
To: "aisdiscuss@aisboard.org" <aisdiscuss@aisboard.org>
Date: Wednesday, March 13, 2013, 10:48 AM
Ron and Gary,I believe you need to get the original 'motion makers' (Susan
Boyce and John Ludi) to agree to the amendment before going forward.Cheryl
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 08:39:42 -0700
From: in2iris@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [AISdiscuss] Motion to remove the operations manual from the
Wiki
To: aisdiscuss@aisboard.org
I second the motion to amend the original motion to:
"That the Operations Manual be maintained on the Iris Wiki and that a copy
of
the Operations Manual be placed on the AIS web site and that the web site
be
indexed to allow easy access to the document."
Gary White
--- On Wed, 3/13/13, Ron Killingsworth <retmiagt@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Ron Killingsworth <retmiagt@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [AISdiscuss] Motion to remove the operations manual from the
Wiki
To: aisdiscuss@aisboard.org
Date: Wednesday, March 13, 2013, 10:17 AM
I think the discussion the last day or so has been very productive. I do
not
agree that the operations manual is of "critical importance" - this
organizations has operated for many years without it. I do think it would
be
nice to have a document that tells you what is expected of your job, having
been appointed to advertising editor and having nothing to help me
determine
what the job really was/is or how to accomplish the job. I have written a
proposed job description for advertising editor to go in the operations
manual.
The general consensus of opinions expressed seems to be that the document
should be on the AIS web site and made easy to find, but that keeping it on
the Wiki Iris is also a good idea. This poses the problem of updating both
versions but that should not be a problem.
I therefore:
Move to amend the motion to read:
"That the Operations Manual be maintained on the Iris Wiki and that a copy
of
the Operations Manual be placed on the AIS web site and that the web site
be
indexed to allow easy access to the document."
Would someone second this amendment?
Ron Killingsworth
Director, AIS
Adv Editor
On 3/11/2013 23:43, Michelle Snyder wrote:
Susan Boyce moved and John Ludi seconded the below motion. As such, it is
officially out for discussion.
"That the Operations Manual be removed from the Iris Wiki and be
posted on the AIS Website."
Michelle Snyder
AIS Secretary
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To
sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary The archives for
AISDiscuss are at: http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
<aissecretary@irises.org>
The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
<aissecretary@irises.org>
The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
<aissecretary@irises.org>
The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/