Re: E-memberships
- To: aisdiscuss@aisboard.org
- Subject: Re: [AISdiscuss] E-memberships
- From: Robt R Pries <rpries@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:02:51 -0800 (PST)
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
- Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=j2AhK5ou+an51xgA+5E1X335oiS/l14vOCYfvYQpKlrNENzM0T4bpfqs5bVUSR7dYJYALUE1XY/4OSSsc2aijGjxuL6/wBCxzh448Zf/5mrtJg4HRdNDBFRjp8uGPnfYsKrFZ7orJdyuoF1z8gchNOy36osaYiC7RnHhD4yWUTE= ;
- In-reply-to: <442DC18B.2020709@comcast.net>
- Reply-to: aisdiscuss@aisboard.org
- Sender: owner-aisdiscuss@aisboard.org
I agree. And I think we are up to it
--- Gerry Snyder <gerrysnyder@comcast.net> wrote:
> Robt R Pries wrote:
>
> >I think Jill makes some good points. While we are
> >brainstorming let me make an additional suggestion.
> >Why not three types of members?
> >
> >1. Subscription to Bulletin (traditional
> membership)
> >2. E-membership only
> >3. E-membership with subscription.
> >
> >The first would be what we all have now. The second
> >would cost just a little less, The economy rate.
> The
> >third would cost somewhat less then the other two
> >combined.
> >
> There would have to be a huge amount of information
> or other perks
> available to the E-members to justify such a pricing
> policy. HUGE!
>
> I'm all for it, but that needs to be kept in mind.
>
> Gerry
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS
> Secretary
> aissecjill@earthlink.net.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
aissecjill@earthlink.net.
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index