Bulletin Proposals
Ladies and Gentlemen members of AISDiscuss:
The points indicated below indicated by two ** were made by members of
the Board in the ongoing email discussion relevant to the search for a new
Editor of the Bulletin, and the desire to analyze Bulletin production, Bulletin
policies and what approaches we might take to improve our most important product
-- the AIS Bulletin. These thoughts were expressed in email exchanges that
took place over the past four days. I selected points that were succinct or
easy to paraphrase. Any "editing" I did for clarity, I placed in parenthesis.
Any personal comment of mine is found in blue-green and ended with my
initials. Remember, these are thoughts thrown out for discussion purposes.
Please use this summary as "seed material" for your thoughts and join in
the discussion.
Jeanne
Here is a summary of some of the points/positions that have been aired for
consideration so far:
** Not only should PAY for the Editor and/or Managing Editor be
discussed, but discussion should also include whether or not there should be
reimbursement for a Bulletin Representative to attend each meeting of the AIS Board.
**1 The AIS Board expects the Bulletin Editor to attend Board meetings (
as it does the MemSec) and on his own nickel.
**2 Job descriptions should define who (if anyone) gets reimbursed
(travel, room and meals) and under what circumstances.
**3 Regarding "Guest Editorships" -- The Winter Bulletin Editor could be
required to attend the fall board meeting, and the Summer Bulletin Editor
could be required to attend the spring board meeting .
**4 Perhaps all Guest Editors might receive pay/reimbursement when they
attend the appropriate board meetings?
**5 Perhaps we could have a full editorial staff meeting at the spring
conventions with the Pres., 1st and 2nd Vice Pres' attending?
**6 Perhaps the Editor position should have a term limit of 5 years?
**7 We need to have a mind-set that says change is an evolving part of
Bulletin production and requires an open mind and ear to the personnel involved
and the technology which is constantly changing.
**8 We need to decide how much leeway guest editors are going to be
given to make changes so we can see their personal style and ideas for the
Bulletin.
**9 My personal favorite is to place this information (organizational
and administrative information) in the back of each Bulletin, but reduce the
font size and minimize the white space.
**10 I personally believe the current layout (font size, white space and
size of iris photos) is excessively wasteful.
**11 If the AIS doesn't have enough worthwhile material to publish,
maybe we should be either using fewer pages per issue or the treacherous concept
of one less issue per year. In the long run the value of our Bulletin will be
judged by its content not just by its looks.
**12 I would like to see the appointment of a new "permanent editor" as
soon as practical with Terry staying on as Managing Editor at least until the
new editor and the Board are comfortable with the new arrangement. While
guest editors may contribute new ideas and concepts, I believe this benefit would
be outweighed by the repetitive experience gained by a permanent editor.
**13 Defining expectations for the Bulletin, especially now before we
have a new permanent editor is an important point.
**14 It is very appropriate to have a well defined job description (for
the Editor) so that everyone understands exactly what is expected from the
editor, staff and the board/committees.
**15 An appropriate contract should be drawn for any AIS position where
the individual holding that that position is drawing a salary (or stipend).
**16 All current and relevant policy positions taken by the Board and
relating in any way to Bulletin production should be complied and presented to
the new position holder with the position's job description. (This is a good
idea for almost any Board position. JCP)
**17 (Font size was brought up more than once in the exchanges between
Board members,JCP) Examples: *I believe (a font size of) 10 is
plenty for business information.
*There doesn't seem to be any unanimous agreement on
desirable font size: 12, 11 or 10
*Our members are near senior citizen status and
would appreciate larger fonts for easy reading.
*I have very bad vision and font size is not a
problem for me.
*(Regarding font size) I suppose we could pose the
question to the membership in a Bulletin filler.
Maybe we call it "Tell the Editor" or "Feedback" I don't have
a problem with that
**18 (White space was another Bulletin attribute that was addressed by
several. JCP)
Example: * I'm for adding as many pages as necessary (to the
Bulletin) as long as they aren't wasted on
organizational material and administrative material standing
in a sea of white.
* (Eliminating white space) is not as easy as you
think. ...you just don't know until publication
gets right down to the wire -- like -- the last day (whether or
not you will have low priority stuff to fill the white
spaces).
* There are good design reasons for white space and
it is often used on purpose. Even in a
publication like ours it serves a purpose.
* I would like to see better use of space as others
have already commented on.
**19 I do like the idea of using this as a trial period for us and
for the Guest Editor.
Please join the discussion.
Jeanne
(I would be intereted to know if you have found this summary (1) interesting
(2) helpful (3) tedious, or (4) a "turn -off with regard to following or
engaging in discussion of this issue.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
Pat Randall <patannran@msn.com>
The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index