RE: [AISvote] Second motion to amend awards ballot

[cheryl deaton <c95039e11@rewrite.aisboard.org>]

I vote no.  It is not fair for any iris to be on the ballot more than3 years.
Cheryl Deaton

> To: aisvote@aisboard.org
> Subject: Re: [AISvote] Second motion to amend awards ballot
> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:29:50 -0400
> From: bfee55511@rewrite.aisboard.org
>
> I vote yes on the  motion below.
>
> Jim Copeland
>
>
> -----Original
> Message-----
> From: Michelle Snyder <102x@rewrite.aisboard.org>
> To: aisvote
> <aisvote@aisboard.org>
> Sent: Tue, Jul 29, 2014 9:54 am
> Subject: [AISvote]
> Second motion to amend awards ballot
>
>
> The time for discussing the below
> motion has now ended.  It is now out
> for vote.
>
> "In cases where there would
> otherwise be fewer than three irises on the
> ballot for the Dykes Medal in any
> iris class, the most recent earlier
> winner(s) of the Special Medal in that
> class that have been dropped from
> the Dykes Medal ballot shall be added back
> to the ballot in order to
> bring the number of candidates up to three."
> Michelle
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To
> sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
> <aissecretary@irises.org>
> The archives for AISVote are at:
> http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisvote/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
> <aissecretary@irises.org>
> The archives for AISVote are at:
> http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisvote/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
<aissecretary@irises.org>
The archives for AISVote are at:
http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisvote/