|
John,
First, I agree with Bob that this is a good motion. Second,
Clarence makes a valid point about charging for such ads. I think your
rationale to get some experience placing picture ads in the rotating
library is wise so I think this trial run should be for one year only.
Then you and AIS can re-assess the situation vis-a-vis charging a fee for such
"advertising."
Jim M.
In a message dated 3/4/2010 10:46:35 A.M. Central Standard Time,
jijones@usjoneses.com writes:
I had given some thought to charging to have a photo placed in the rotating library, and we could do that, but I would like to get some experience with the project to find out if, in fact, all pictures in the library get uniform exposure (as indicated by a page view count). It would be unfair if photos that were higher up on the list get more exposure than those lower on the list. |