Re: July AIS Bulletin for Emembers
- To: aisdiscuss@aisboard.org
- Subject: Re: July AIS Bulletin for Emembers
- From: MORRISJE1@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:40:41 -0400 (EDT)
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1343691642; bh=HdZjVr5UgNjwlYLB9uBe+KF05ZljgG7hjF6D5sKdwUc=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=eNt+b98mprOnEtsFyx/50j2+ifwKTyJ+McbpZ9n1+12fQcZGDD+KCbfDNF+L7+Xi1 /QlLHnXNMRVUymTNg1TecQCOKxN6QC0nXqHBYRIF0O6BcaHebarDT8+WNka9y45KkY MnPeMupM2NmmIhuPyleBXneVgm1uey89h5vowo1M=
Clarence,
The AIS members (you and me included) passed the appropriate Bylaws changes
that defined and implemented the e-membership category in 2011. It
resulted from committee work and was discussed to death at a board meeting
before being presented to the general membership for approval.
Despite yeoman efforts by many board members to reduce AIS costs, we have
operated under a deficit budget for about five years. Long-time Life
members have had their dues accrued (used up) for quite some time and are in
effect "getting a free ride" and that is okay, but must be willing to help on
new services. The online registration database irisregister, has been from
its inception, a SERVICE that was paid for separately from any AIS
Membership class. AIS Life Members were not given gratis subscriptions to
irisregister. They had to pay from the beginning. AIS could not have developed it
if not for the Electronic Services Restricted Fund (ESRF) developed by
money from the Geek Dinner auction. Since that time the irisregister fees have
covered their own costs and provided additional funding for other
electronic services projects and enhancements. But AIS could not afford the OCR
scanning of past Bulletins so we were fortunate that the AIS Foundation paid
for it, I believe around $18,000. The big point is that our existing
membership dues structure doesn't pay for the benefits received. Do we want to
raise the dues to the $40 that would sustain us? I don't think so as I
believe that we would lose even more members just when it looks like we have
started increasing. Maybe the current $30 dues and $10 electronic services
(emembership) is more appropriate.
John Jones pointed out that: To provide a basis of value for the AIS
E-Membership irisregister was made part of the E-Membership. The then current
subscribers to irisregister were made AIS E-Members. The subscription fee
for irisregister had been $10.00 per year since it was made a paid-for
service in September of 2003. In light of that and that the Board wished to
enhance e-services with the addition of more electronic content, the Board set
the annual fee for E-Membership at $15.00. No discounts for multiple year
subscriptions were established.
The big point is that our existing membership dues structure doesn't pay
for all the benefits received. Do we want to raise the dues to the $40
that would sustain us? Do we want to decrease the Bulletin to three issues
from four? I don't think so as I believe that we would lose even more
members just when it looks like we have started increasing. Maybe $30 dues and
$10 electronic services (emembership) is more appropriate.
Perhaps we should re-address the issue at our fall board meeting in
November. Suggestions and/or proposals would be welcomed. We would like for
those who have responded here to be part of the solution not the problem.
Thank you for reading this. Please help us out.
Jim
In a message dated 7/30/2012 2:20:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
cemahan@aol.com writes:
And do the by laws permit these types of memberships? What do they say
about
ememgership?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to the AIS Secretary
<aissecretary@irises.org>
The archives for AISDiscuss are at:
http://www.aisboard.org/lists/aisdiscuss/
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index